Contact
-
Newsletter Food for thought
-
LinkedIn SLU Future Food
-
Podcast Feeding your mind
-
YouTube SLU Future Food
Food waste is a problem because it takes resources and causing environmental impact of the food system without providing the intended benefits. FAO estimates that about 1/3 of all food produced for human consumption is thrown or lost. Losses and losses occur in all stages of the food chain. In the richer countries, the consumers step is the step where the largest losses occur.
At the consumer step, food waste can be leftovers that are not used and at the store it can be items with short expiration date. There are also losses in primary production, such as animals that die during breeding.
The food makes relatively little use as a fuel or biogas raw material. Therefore, it is best to ensure that the waste does not occur by not overbooking, either at trade or consumer level. In addition, it is important that the food industry can get products our from all side streams.
Of the nine planetary boundaries of survival of humanity and planet, five have already passed or are in an uncertain zone (biodiversity, land use, freshwater use, biogeochemical cycle and climate impact), with agriculture as the main driving force for four and strongly contributing to the fifth (Campbell et al., 2017; Figure 1). Gordon et al (2017) writes that food production accounts for a high proportion of human total load:
Climatic impacts will then add 5-10% to the stages of agriculture: food industry, distribution, storage, cooking, etc. (Vermeulen et al., 2012), thus rising to 30-35%. With this extensive impact, food therefore has a decisive impact on how well we will succeed in sustainable development for life on earth. Johan Rockström, in connection with his new cookbook, has come up with a quote that summarizes the situation in a simple way: "If we fix the food, we fix the planet."
Springmann et al (2018) has in an article in Nature studied various action scenarios to cope with the food system within the limits of the planet. Only if you combine the most ambitious measures will you achieve the goal until 2050 (Figure 2, and below).
Action | Scenario / Ambition level |
Food waste and losses |
Reduce by 75 % |
Dietary adaption |
Flexitarian, plant based |
Production technology | Tech + |
Radically reducing food habits and losses is thus one of the three most important measures we can make in the food system for clear humanity within the limits of the planet.
In 2015, the UN adopted 17 Sustainability Objectives (SDGs) under Agenda 2030. The EU is committed to incorporate these development goals into both its internal and external policies (European Commission, 2018). In Sweden, a formal national target is still missing (Food Administration, 2018).
SDG 12.3 is about food waste and is expressed as following: By 2030, half per capita global food waste at retail and consumer levels and reducing food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses. This goal has been widely recognized, and is mentioned in, among others, the Food Strategy (Swedish Government, 2017), "A comprehensive and systematic approach should be taken to enable Sweden to live up to the UN's global sustainability goal of halving global food welfare by 2030 per person. "Compared with the Nature article above, the UN's policy-oriented goal of a 50% reduction in food wage by 2030 appears to be just one step towards the scientifically estimated 75% as needed.
Globally, it is about 5 times greater production volumes of vegetable commodities than animal commodities, including those used as animal feed (FAO, 2011). At the same time, animal food generally accounts for higher climate and other environmental impacts (Clune et al., 2017; Röös et al., 2013).
This means that it can be more effective to try to reduce the loss of animal products, if it is the planetary boundaries we want to protect. Every saved kilo meat that leads to new meat not having to be produced is a many times greater profit compared to a corresponding kilo of potatoes. If the halfway goal is not taken into account for plants and animalsier individually, there is a risk that this will be filled out by mostly vegetables without causing the desired effect.
Measures should rather be prioritized to quickly reduce animal waste, so that the first reduction, down to 50%, largely reduces the loss of animal products.
In Sweden, the Swedish Food Administration, the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and the Swedish Agriculture Agency have received a joint government assignment to develop a trade plan for reduced food welfare. In June 2018, their report "More Doing More - Action Plan for Reduced Food Work 2030" was presented. Four areas are particularly highlighted:
This text is written by Ingrid Strid, researcher at the Department of Energy and Technology.
Newsletter Food for thought
LinkedIn SLU Future Food
Podcast Feeding your mind
YouTube SLU Future Food
Campbell, B. M., D. J. Beare, E. M. Bennett, J. M. Hall-Spencer, J. S. I. Ingram, F. Jaramillo, R. Ortiz, N. Ramankutty, J. A. Sayer, and D. Shindell. 2017. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecology and Society 22(4):8.
Clune, S., Crossin, E., Verghese, K., 2017. Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories, Journal of Cleaner Production 140(2), 766-783.
Europakommissionen, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/policies/sustainable-development-goals_en, avläst 2018-10-26.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2011. Global food losses and food waste – Extent, causes and prevention. Rome, pp. 37.
Förenta Nationerna (FN), 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, pp. 35.
Gordon, L. J., Bignet, V., Crona, B., Henriksson, P. J. G., Van Holt, T., Jonell, M., Lindahl, T., Troell, M., Barthel, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., Haider, L. J., Rockstrom, J., Queiroz, C., 2017. Rewiring food systems to enhance human health and biosphere stewardship, Environmental Research Letters 12(10), 1-12.
Livsmedelsverket, 2018. Fler gör mer - Handlingsplan för minskat matsvinn 2030, pp. 38.
Röös E, Sundberg C, Tidåker P, Strid I, Hansson P-A (2013) Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production? Ecological Indicators 24:573–581.
Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., de Vries, W., Vermeulen, S. J., Herrero, M., Carlson, K. M., Jonell, M., Troell, M., DeClerck, F., Gordon, L. J., Zurayk, R., Scarborough, P., Rayner, M., Loken, B., Fanzo, J., Godfray, H. C. J., Tilman, D., Rockström, J., Willett, W., 2018. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits, Nature, Article.
Rockström, J., Bignet, V., Landqvist, M., 2018. Eat Good : recept som förändrar världen, Max Ström förlag, pp. 221.
Sveriges Regering, 2017. En livsmedelsstrategi för Sverige − fler jobb och hållbar tillväxt i hela landet, Prop. 2016/17:104, pp. 134.
Vermeulen, S.J., Campbell, B.M., Ingram, J.S.I., 2012. Climate Change and Food Systems, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37:1, 195-222.