FyrisCOST

Last changed: 16 March 2023

FyrisCOST is a PC-based catchment scale decision support system (DSS) for the evaluation of alternative nutrient mitigation strategies. The model is able to evaluate a range of mitigation approaches for phosphorous (P) and nitogen (N) from point and diffuse sources. FyrisCOST also contains measures involving changes in land use, such as the construction of wetland areas in key positions. This allows cost efficiency to be estimated for a catchment based on the combination of a wide range of measures.

FyrisCOST is currently not in use.

Available N measures

  • Changed crop distribution
  • Changed land use
  • Changed fertilisation regime
  • Catch crop and/or spring tillage
  • Changes in household septic systems

Available P measures

  • Changed crop distribution
  • Changed land use
  • Buffer strips
  • Changes in household septic systems

FyrisCOST has been used to develop FyrisSKZ, which is a web-based tool to show results from a national database of effects and costs of buffer-zones. 

Examples

Facts:

FyrisCOST is a decision support system (DSS) for the evaluation of measures to reduce eutrophication on a catchment scale. Development of the FyrisCOST system started in 2009 as a method to provide support to, public authorities, county administrators and water councils working with the evaluation of programs of measures to reduce eutrophication on a catchment level. A prototype of the system has been completed for Swedish two catchments; the Lagan River and and the Svärtaå catchment. Both of these catchments flow to the Baltic Sea. The Svärtaå catchment is being used as part of the EU-Intereg project Baltic Compass.

System structure 

FyrisCOST is a DSS for the evaluation of alternative nutrient mitigation strategies. The model is able to evaluate a range of mitigation approaches for phosphorous and nitrogen from several sources (point and diffuse). This allows cost efficiency to be estimated for a specific catchment based on a combination of measures. Riverine nutrient transport and retention in the FyrisCOST system are built on the semi-distributed model FyrisNP and nutrient losses from arable land are derived from simulations from the Nutrient Leaching Coefficient Calculation System (NLeCCS) which includes the ICECREAMDB  model for estimating phosphorus losses and the SOILNDB model for soil nitrogen leaching.

FyrisCOST can be set up with data for a particular catchment and uses this input to run load calculations for: 1) a baseline (includes existing mitigation measures), 2) a zero scenario (no measures), 3) mitigation scenarios (combinations of measures).

Phosphorous mitigation measures

FyrisCOST calculates concentration of phosphorous (P) in effluent water based on soil type, crop distribution, point sources and measures. The main abatement measure for reducing P losses from agricultural land included in the model is buffer strips. To calculate the effect of a specific buffer strip width on particulate phosphorus erosion, detailed GIS information on slope, flow accumulations and field lengths has been compiled. Loss coefficients for buffer strip efficiency based on slope, soil type, field length and buffer width are currently under construction in the model.

Nitrogen mitigation measures

FyrisCOST calculates nitrogen concentrations in effluent water for each sub-catchment. The concentration of nitrogen is dependent on the current land use and geographical conditions. In order to evaluate agricultural scenarios in FyrisCOST a method for calculating N leaching from agricultural land was constructed. The calculation includes crop rotations and tillage systems and differentiates between annual and perennial crops. The system is able to take into account that a primary crop is followed by a specific crop/tillage system and estimate the effect of this on nutrient losses using a specially developed routine for calculating mean leaching concentrations.

Cost efficiency of measures

Each measure or combination of measures in a scenario is evaluated based on reduction effects and costs for each sub-catchment. The measures can be ranked by gross cost efficiency in a sub-catchment or on net cost efficiency in a recipient. The recipient may be a lake, a coastline or a sub-catchment. An important feature in calculating cost efficiency is downstream retention. FyrisCOST has the capacity of including all features for a future.

Further reading

Read a poster presentation about FyrisCOST.

Collentine, D., Johnsson, H., Larsson, P., Markensten H., Persson, K. 2015. Designing cost efficient buffer zone programs: An application of the FyrisSKZ tool in a Swedish catchment. AMBIO 44 (Suppl 2), 311–318.