Research methods for business studies
Course evaluation
Additional course evaluations for FÖ0446
Academic year 2024/2025
Research methods for business studies (FÖ0446-30217)
2025-01-20 - 2025-03-24
Academic year 2023/2024
Research methods for business studies (FÖ0446-30325)
2024-01-15 - 2024-03-19
Academic year 2022/2023
Research methods for business studies (FÖ0446-40087)
2023-03-22 - 2023-06-04
Academic year 2021/2022
Research methods for business studies (FÖ0446-40107)
2022-03-24 - 2022-06-05
Academic year 2020/2021
Research methods for business studies (FÖ0446-40089)
2021-03-24 - 2021-06-06
Academic year 2019/2020
Research methods for business studies (FÖ0446-40074)
2020-03-25 - 2020-06-07
Academic year 2018/2019
Research methods for business studies (FÖ0446-40118)
2019-03-26 - 2019-06-09
Syllabus and other information
Syllabus
FÖ0446 Research methods for business studies, 7.5 Credits
Företagsekonomiska forskningsmetoderSubjects
Business AdministrationEducation cycle
Master’s levelModules
Title | Credits | Code |
---|---|---|
Single module | 7.5 | 0101 |
Advanced study in the main field
Second cycle, has only first-cycle course/s as entry requirementsMaster’s level (A1N)
Grading scale
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Language
EnglishPrior knowledge
Knowledge equivalent to 180 credits, including 90 credits of business studies (business administration). English 6.Objectives
The general aim in this course is to support the development of understanding of methodological issues in academic business studies, including understanding of how methodological choices affect the process and outcome of projects and research.
After successful completion of the course, students will be able to:
Describe how research goals and ethical dimensions influence the choice of an appropriate research design.
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of common research designs, including different methods for collecting and analyzing data.
Use a methodological understanding to critically interpret and discuss academic studies.
Develop and present a research plan, including a well-motivated method design.
Content
The course is largely based on assigned readings, discussion seminars, and written assignments. The course begins with a review of the philosophical issues that underlie methodological choices in academic research, which is followed by an overview of common methods for collecting, analyzing, presenting and assessing data in different approaches. With an established awareness that choices of method are influenced by subjective and philosophical positions, the course then proceeds with a more in-depth review of a number of sub-topics.
The sub-topics address the following issues:
the role of the researcher
logically consistent research design and rhetoric in presentation
relevance and contribution (empirical and theoretical)
different methods and techniques for data collection (e.g. interviews, questionnaires, archival data)
different methods and techniques for data analysis (e.g. content analysis, regression analysis)
different parts of a research proposal, including critically reflective issues on individual parts and how they fit together.
Grading form
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.Formats and requirements for examination
Passed exam.
Passed assignments.
Passed project work.
If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Other information
The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Responsible department
Department of Economics
Further information
Litterature list
Book
- Bell, E., Bryman, A. and Harley, B. 2018. Business Research Methods. Oxford university press. (Assigned chapters based on 5th ed., but 6th ed. is now available)
Journal Articles
Bryman, A., 2007. The research question in social research: what is its role? International journal of social research methodology, 10(1), pp.5-20.
Creswell, J.W., 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Chapter 4). Sage.
Golafshani, N., 2003. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. *The Qualitative Report *8, 597–607.
King, B., 2012. Problems vs. Theory, OrgTheory.net. Sept. 12, 2012 https://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2012/09/12/problems-vs-theory/.
Labaree, R. 2020. Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Types of Research Design. USC Libraries. https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/researchdesigns.
Linneberg, M.S. and Korsgaard, S., 2019. Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal.
Mackenzie, N., Knipe, S., 2006. Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research 16(2). https://www.academia.edu/download/6787014/Research_article_IER.pdf
Mazzocchi, Mario. (2008). Statistics for marketing and consumer research. Los Angeles, Calif. ; SAGE. Chapter 6. Hypothesis testing.
Rocco, T.S., Plakhotnik, M.S., 2009. Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions. *Human Resource Development Review *8, 120–130.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., 2009. Understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory development, Chpt. 4 in Research methods for business students. Pearson education. (Note: Author has made this chapter available for download on ResearchGate).
Whetten, D. A., 1989. What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.