Djurvälfärd, djurskydd och etologi
Information från kursledaren
Zoom-link
Dear all, This is the course zoom -link, which will be the same through out the course: https://slu-se.zoom.us/j/67804906781 Passcode: 138935 Best wishes, Jenny and Anna
2020-07-01
Welcome to HV0188 – Animal welfare and behavior – 2020
Welcome to HV0188 – Animal welfare and behavior – 2020! This year the entire course will be given digital via zoom. The course starts with a course introduction November 2, 10:00-12:00. A zoom-link to the introduction will be added in a message here on the course site. If you want to prepare before the course on the basic elements of animal behavior and welfare we suggest that you read Jensen 2009 (at least part 1). This book indicates the level of knowledge that is expected at course start. • Jensen, P. (2009). The ethology of domestic animals: An introductory text. Wallingford: CABI Pub. Jensen, 2009 (or at least an older version from 2002) is available as e-book at the SLU library. Best wishes, Jenny Yngvesson and Anna Wallenbeck
Kursvärdering
Kursvärderingen är avslutad
HV0188-20034 - Sammanställning av kursvärdering
Efter att kursvärderingen stängt har kursansvarig och studentrepresentanten upp till en månad på sig att skriva kommentarer. De publiceras automatiskt i sammanställningen.
Andra kursvärderingar för HV0188
Läsåret 2021/2022
Djurvälfärd, djurskydd och etologi (HV0188-20007)
2021-11-02 - 2022-01-16
Kursplan och övrig information
Kursplan
HV0188 Djurvälfärd, djurskydd och etologi, 15,0 Hp
Animal welfare and behaviourÄmnen
Husdjursvetenskap BiologiUtbildningens nivå
Avancerad nivåModuler
Benämning | Hp | Kod |
---|---|---|
Quiz | 1,0 | 0102 |
Djuretik | 2,0 | 0103 |
Etologi | 6,0 | 0104 |
Djurskydd och djurvälfärd | 6,0 | 0105 |
Fördjupning
Avancerad nivå, har endast kurs/er på grundnivå som förkunskapskravAvancerad nivå (A1N)
Betygsskala
Kraven för kursens olika betygsgrader framgår av betygskriterier, som ska finnas tillgängliga senast vid kursstart.
Språk
EngelskaFörkunskapskrav
Kunskaper motsvarande- 120 hp på grundnivå, varav
- 60 hp biologi, husdjursvetenskap, hippologi, djuromvårdnad eller veterinärmedicin
alternativt 60 hp lantbruksvetenskap (varav minst 30 hp husdjursvetenskap/zoologi)
Samt
- Engelska 6
Mål
Kursen avser att ge fördjupad kunskap om djurs grundläggande behov, beteende, miljö och välfärd samt sambanden mellan dessa.
Efter avslutad kurs ska studenten kunna:
diskutera och kritiskt granska forskning inom etologi, djurskydd och djurvälfärd,
bedöma och diskutera olika djurhållningsformer utifrån perspektiven djurvälfärd, etologi och djuretik
tillämpa djurskyddslagstiftning och/eller djurskyddsregelverk och kunna analysera och reflektera över dessa både ur ett nationellt och internationellt perspektiv på djurvälfärd och djuretik
utforma och genomföra projekt inom etologi och djurvälfärd med hjälp av lämpliga experimentella metoder och med lämplig design
presentera vetenskaplig information för en specificerad publik
Innehåll
Kursen innehåller fördjupning inom områdena etologi och djurskydd.
Kursen är uppbyggd av självstudier med seminarier av vetenskaplig litteratur, där studenten aktivt leder genomförandet. Kursen innehåller ett antal nyckelföreläsningar, tillämpade övningar, bedömning av djurhållningsformer samt ett projektarbete i form av en vetenskaplig etologisk studie. I kursen tränas de generella kompetenserna debatt och argumentationsförmåga genom övningar där aktuella djurskyddsfrågor diskuteras ut flera olika perspektiv. Kursen innehåller ett projektarbete och studiebesök.
Obligatoriska moment förekommer inom t.ex. övningar, seminarium, projektarbeten och studiebesök.
Betygsformer
Kraven för kursens olika betygsgrader framgår av betygskriterier, som ska finnas tillgängliga senast vid kursstart.Examinationsformer och fordringar för godkänd kurs
Godkänd skriftlig och muntlig examination. Godkänt deltagande i obligatoriska moment.
- Om studenten inte blivit godkänd på ett prov har examinatorn rätt att ge en kompletteringsuppgift – om det finns skäl för det och om det är möjligt.
- Om studenten har ett beslut från SLU om särskilt pedagogiskt stöd på grund av funktionsnedsättning, har examinatorn rätt att ge ett anpassat prov eller låta studenten genomföra provet på ett alternativt sätt.
- Om denna kursplan ändras, eller om kursen läggs ner, ska SLU besluta om övergångsregler för examination av studenter, som antagits enligt denna kursplan och ännu inte blivit godkända.
- För examination av självständigt arbete (examensarbete) gäller dessutom att examinatorn kan tillåta studenten att göra kompletteringar efter inlämningsdatum. Mer information finns i utbildningshandboken
Övergångsbestämmelser
Examination: Minst tre omprov ska erbjudas under två år efter beslut om nedläggning. Obligatoriska moment: Minst en förnyad möjlighet att uppfylla obligatoriekrav ska erbjudas inom två år efter beslut om nedläggning.Övriga upplysningar
- Rätten att delta i undervisning och/eller handledning gäller endast det kurstillfälle, som studenten blivit antagen till och registrerad på.
- Om det finns särskilda skäl, har studenten rätt att delta i moment som kräver obligatorisk närvaro vid ett senare kurstillfälle. Mer information finns i utbildningshandboken.
Ytterligare information
Kursen förutsätter goda förkunskaper i etologi, djurskydd och tillämpad statistik/försöksplanering motsvarande minst 5 hp per ämne.Kostnader för studiebesök kan tillkomma.
Ansvarig institution/motsvarande
Institutionen för husdjurens miljö och hälsa
Kompletterande uppgifter
Betygskriterier
Examination activity |
Learning objective 1 |
Learning objective 2 |
Learning objective 3 |
Learning objective 4 |
Learning objective 4 |
Quiz |
Mark 4 or 5: Quiz passed before deadline Mark 3: Quiz passed |
Mark 4 or 5: Quiz passed before deadline Mark 3: Quiz passed |
Mark 4 or 5: Quiz passed before deadline Mark 3: Quiz passed |
|
|
Ethics assignment |
Mark 3: The student discuss and review research on ethics related to ethology, animal welfare and animal protection critically. |
Mark 3: The student assess and discuss different animal husbandry forms based on an ethics perspective. |
Mark 3: The student describes different ethical standpoints in a chosen animal ethics dilemma. |
|
|
Poster symposium |
Mark 3: The student demonstrates an ability to present animal welfare issues in the poster format. |
|
|
|
Mark 3: The students collaborate and produce a poster with the target group of the students of the course. |
Project |
Mark 3: The student demonstrates the complexity in drawing conclusions about animal welfare from data, scientific literature and real life situations. |
|
|
Mark 3: The students carry out a collaborative project, using scientific literature, and finding or gathering data, analyse with an appropriate method (method should be reflected on) and discuss their results in the light of relevant scientific literature. |
Mark 3: The student demonstrate knowledge on how changes in animal husbandry may affect the different parameters of animal welfare. |
PBL |
Mark 3: The student shall after completing the course be able to actively and critically discuss the problems chosen by the group in the light of scientific literature and real life situations. |
Mark 3: The student shall after completing the course be able to assess and discuss different animal husbandry forms based on an animal welfare, behaviour and ethics perspective within the problems chosen by the group. |
|
|
|
Home exam |
See table with specific requirements |
|
|
|
|
Course objectives |
discuss and review research within ethology, animal welfare and animal protection critically |
assess and discuss different animal husbandry forms based on an animal welfare, behaviour and ethics perspective
|
apply animal welfare legislation and/or regulations and analyse and reflect on both national and international aspects on animal welfare and animal ethics |
design and carry out projects and within animal behaviour and welfare using appropriate experimental and design methods |
present scientific information aimed at a specified audience |
Specific criteria for the graded mark set from the home exam:
Home exam |
Mark 3 |
Mark 4 |
Mark 5 |
LO1 Discuss and review research within ethology, animal welfare and animal protection critically
|
The student demonstrates the ability to review scientific literature in relation to a specific case.
|
The student describes hers/his assessment of the animal welfare state and/or animal behaviour based on the literature reviewed. |
The student demonstrates the ability to value the quality (e.g. study design, methods chosen) of the scientific literature reviewed. |
LO2 assess and discuss different animal husbandry forms based on an animal welfare, behaviour and ethics perspective |
The student makes an assessment and a comparison of animal husbandry form. The assessment is based on scientific literature and evaluated with ethical arguments. |
With the use of scientific literature, the student suggests improvement of the animal husbandry forms described.
|
|
LO3 apply animal welfare legislation and/or regulations and analyse and reflect on both national and international aspects on animal welfare and animal ethics |
The student describes animal welfare legislation or other types of regulations used in different countries or parts of the world. Furthermore, the student describes different ethical standpoints in a chosen animal ethics dilemma.
|
With the use of scientific literature, the student suggests improvement of the legislation/regulations described.
|
The student analyses arguments might potentially affect the ethical standpoints described (see mark 3 requirements) in relation to the suggested improvements (see mark 4).
|
Litteraturlista
- Obligatory literature Kommentar: 1) Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare : The science in its cultural context (UFAW animal welfare series). Oxford ; Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Scientific papers related to course activities
- Not obligatory but highly recommended Kommentar: One book focusing on Animal Behaviour, of your own choice. Here are some suggestions (if you find another book on the corresponding level that is more relevant for you that is ok):
Manning, A., & Dawkins, M. (2012). An introduction to animal behaviour (6th ed.). Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Price, E. (2008). Principles and applications of domestic animal behavior: An introductory text. Wallingford: CABI.
Broom, D., & Fraser, A. (2015). Domestic animal behaviour and welfare. (Fifth edition / Donald M. Broom and Andrew F. Fraser. ed.). Wallingford: CABI.
Martin, P., & Bateson, P. (2007). Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide (3.rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
- If you want to prepare before the course Kommentar: If you want to prepare before the course on the basic elements of animal behaviour (and welfare) we suggest that you read Jensen 2009 (at least part 1). This book indicates the level of knowledge that is expected at course start.
• Jensen, P. (2009). The ethology of domestic animals: An introductory text. Wallingford: CABI Pub.
Jensen, 2009 (or at least an older version from 2002) is available as e-book at the SLU library.
- Ethic litterature Kommentar: TEXTS ON ANIMAL ETHICS IN GENERAL
William Sweet, 2000, Bases of Ethics. To find e-books: log in to Ebook Central at https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/auth/lib/slub-ebooks/login.action?returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Febookcentral.proquest.com%2Flib%2Fslub-ebooks%2Fhome.action Once logged in to EBook Central you will find it under Search by subject, and then Philosophy.
Also, chapter no 2 on ethical theories of the following book might be useful: Röcklinsberg, Gjerris and Olsson (eds) 2017, Animal ethics in Animal Research, Cambridge univ Press
https://slub-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=SLUB_ALEPH001905546&context=L&vid=SLUB_V1&lang=sv_SE&search_scope=default_scope&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=default_tab&query=any,contains,ANimal%20ethics%20in%20animal%20research&mode=Basic
Gjerris, M, Juul Nielsen, M. E., Sandøe, P. 2013. The Good, the right and the Fair – an introduction to ethics. London: College publications, 180 pp.
Hursthouse, Rosalind, 2000. Ethics, Humans and Other Animals. An introduction with readings. Routledge
Sandøe, P., Christiansen, S., B., 2008. Ethics of animal use. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Singer, Peter, 1975. Animal liberation. Harper Collins, New York
Regan, Tom, 1987. The case for animal rights. Springer, New York
Diamond, Cora, 2001. ”Injustice and Animals”, i Elliott, Carl (ed.) Slow Cures and Bad Philosophers. Essays on Wittgenstein, Medicine, and Bioethics Duke University Press. Durham and London.
Francione, Gary L., 2008. Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation, New York: Columbia University Press, cop.
Bekoff M, Pierce J. 2009. Wild justice: The moral lives of animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Abbate, C. 2014. Virtues and Animals: A Minimally Decent Ethic for Practical Living in a Non-ideal World. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (6):909-929
Hursthouse, Rosalind 2006. Applying virtue ethics to our treatment of the other animals. In: Welchman J (ed) The practice of virtue: Classic and contemporary readings in virtue ethics. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis
Tännsjö, Torbjörn, 2010. Animal ethics: a crash course. Thales
TEXTS ON ANIMAL RESEARCH AND EXPERIMENTING
Monamy, Vaughan, 2000. Animal Experimentation. A Guide to the Issues. Cambridge Univ. Press
Nordgren Anders 2010. For Our Children: The Ethics of Animal Experimentation in the Age of Genetic Engineering, vol 215. Rodopi, Amsterdam
Röcklinsberg, Gjerris and Olsson (eds) 2017, Animal ethics in Animal Research, Cambridge univ Press
Info on research ethics codes: http://www.codex.vr.se/en/index.shtml
Hippocratic oath: http://www.slideshare.net/azzipkhan/hippocratic-oath-ppt
Sveriges akademiska etologer: http://www.sverigesakademiskaetologer.se/index.php/yrkeskodex
TEXTS RELATED TO VETERINARY ETHICS
Morgan, C.A., McDonald, M., (2007). Ethical Dilemmas in Veterinary Medicine. VeterinaryClinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 37: 165–179. Rollin, B. E., (2006). An Introduction to Veterinary Medical Ethics. 2.ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Rollin, Bernard E. 2011. Euthanasia, moral stress, and chronic illness in veterinary medicine. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 41(3) 651-659.
Röcklinsberg, H. Gamborg, C., Gjerris, M. 2013. “A case for integrity: Advantages of including more than animal welfare in Animal Ethics Committees’ deliberations”. Laboratory Animals, Vol 48 (1) pp. 61-71.
Sveriges veterinärförbund: http://www.svf.se/sv/Forbundet/Stadgar-regler-mm/Etiska-regler/
Meijboom, F (2017), ”More Than Just a Vet? Professional Integrity as an Answer to the Ethical Challenges Facing Veterinarians in Animal Food Production”.
TEXTS ON FOOD AND PRODUCTION ANIMALS
Gjerris, M., Gamborg, C. & Röcklinsberg, H. (2016) Ethical aspects of insect production for food and feed. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, Vol 2(2), pp.101-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2015.0097
Sandøe, P., Christiansen, S., B., (2008). Ethics of animal use. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Thompson, P. 2015. From field to fork. Food ethics for everyone. Oxford; New York: Oxford Univ Press, 346 pp.
Borkfelt, S., Kondrop, S., Röcklinsberg, H., Bjørkdahl, K and Gjerris, M. Closer to Nature? A Critical Discussion of the Marketing of “Ethical” Animal Products. (2015) Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics: Volume 28, Issue 6 (2015), pp. 1053-1073. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10806-015-9577-4
Mepham, Ben 2000. A Framework for the Ethical Analysis of Novel Foods: The Ethical Matrix. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (12), 165-176.
Mepham, Ben Short version: http://www.foodethicscouncil.org/uploads/publications/Ethical_Matrix_1.pdf
D’Eath, RB., Conington, J., Lawrence, AB, Olsson, IAS and Sandøe, P. 2010. Breeding for behavioural change in farm animals: practical, economic and ethical considerations. Animal Welfare 19, 17-27
Algers, Bo & Smulders, J.M. 2009. Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks. Wageningen : Wageningen Academic Publishers
TEXTS ON ISSUES RELATED TO PROFESSIONS
Fryer, Mick, 2011. Facilitative leadership: drawing on Jürgen Habermas' model of ideal speech to propose a less impositional way to lead Facilitative leadership: drawing on Jürgen Habermas' model. Organization, published online 7 April 2011 http://org.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/03/18/1350508411401462.full.pdf+html
Kaiser, M., Millar K, Thorstensen E & Tomkins S (2007): Developing the Ethical Matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (20), 65–80)
Jan-Ola Östman and Anna Solin /eds) 2016. Discourse and responsibility in professional settings. Sheffield, UK ; Equinox Publishing Ltd.
TEXTS RELATED TO CRITICAL/FEMINIST ANIMAL STUDIES
Dunayer, Joan 2002. Animal Equality. Language and Liberation. Lantern Books.
Kemmerer, Lisa (ed.) 2011. Sister Species. Women, Animals and Social Justice University of illinois Press.
Marvin, Garry 2005. ‘Guest Editor’s Introduction: Seeing, Looking, Watching, Observing Nonhuman Animals.’ Society and Animals. Vol. 13, 2005:1. http://psyeta.org/sa/sa13.1/garry_marvin.pdf
Adams, Carol J. 2003. The Sexual Politics of Meat. A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York-London: Continuum.
Donovan Josephine and Adams Carol, 2007. The feminist care tradition in animal ethics: A reader. Columbia University Press, New York
Kemmerer, Lisa (ed.) 2011. Sister Species. Women, Animals and Social Justice. University of Illinois Press.
Nussbaum, Martha 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, nationality, species membership (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values), Belknap (Harvard), 512 pp.
Robert Garner and Siobhan O'Sullivan, eds, 2016, The political turn in animal ethics. Rowman & Littlefield
Ramona Ilea 2008. Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach and Nonhuman Animals: Theory and Public Policy JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 39 No. 4, Winter 2008, 547–563.
TEXTS ON ANIMAL LEGISLATION AND POLICYMAKING
Lundmark, F., Berg, C., Schmid, O., Behdadi, D. & Röcklinsberg, H. 2014. Intentions and Values in Animal Welfare Legislation and Standards. J of Agri and Environ Ethics. 2014, Vol.27 (6), pp.991-1017. (e-book at SLU?)
Lundmark, F., Berg, L. and Röcklinsberg, H. 2013. “‘Unnecessary suffering’ as a concept in animal welfare legislation and standards”. In: Röcklinsberg, H, Sandin, P. (eds.) The ethics of consumption. The citizen, the market, and the law. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Pbs., pp.114-119. (e-book at SLU?) Marcel Dol, Martje Fentener van Vlissingen, Soemini Kasanmoentalib, Thijs Visser and Hub Zwart 1999. Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals. Beyond Animal Welfare. Van Gorcum Ldt. Lundmark, F., Röcklinsberg, H., Wahlberg, B. and Berg, C. (2016) Content and structure of Swedish animal welfare legislation and private standards for dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A- Animal Science 66, 35-42. DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2016.1198417
Yates, J., Röcklinsberg, H., Gjerris, M., 2011. “Is welfare all that matters? A discussion of what should be included in policymaking regarding animals”, Animal Welfare, 20:423-432.
TEXTS RELATED TO BIOTECHNOLOGY
Lennart Nordenfelt, 2006. Animal and human welfare. A comparative philosophical analysis. Cambridge, Mass. Cabi.
Olsson, IAS and Sandøe, P. 2004. Ethical decisions concerning animal biotechnology: what is the role of animal welfare science? Animal Welfare 13, 139-144.
Vorstenbosch, Jan, 1993. The concept of integrity. Its significance for the ethical discussion on biotechnology and animals. Livestock Production Science 36, 109-112.
TEXTS RELATED TO RELIGIOUS PERSPECTIVES ON ANIMALS
Haidt, Jonathan, 2013 The Righteous Mind, Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Penguin Books
Stafleu FR, Grommers FJ and Vorstenbosch J., 1996. Animal welfare: Evolution and erosion of a moral concept. Animal Welfare 5: 225-234
TEXTS ON THE EMPATHY AND THE HUMAN-ANIMAL RELATION
Hemsworth, PH. (2003) Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81(3) 185-198.
Herzog, H. (2002) Ethical aspects of relationships between humans and research animals. ILAR Journal, 43(1) 27-32.
Frans de Waal, 2009. The age of empathy: nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Crown
Taylor, N., & Signal, TD. (2005) Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoös, 18(1), 18-27.